No. 06-5402.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: May 29, 2007.
[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
BEFORE: Randolph, Garland, and Griffith, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, it is
ORDERED that the motion be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v.Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam).
Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.
Page 1