No. 07-5198.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: January 31, 2008.
BEFORE: Sentelle, Brown, and Griffith, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is
ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action.See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam).
Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel and enter a briefing schedule.
Appellant is reminded that she must file an appendix to her brief in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 30 and make any citations to the appendix or other sources pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 28. Rule 30 requires that “[t]he appendix must begin with a table of contents identifying the page at which each part begins” and that “[t]he relevant docket entries must follow the table of contents.” Circuit Rule 28 mandates that citations to the record, authorities, or any other material “must refer to specific pages of the source.”
Page 1