Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent Renewable Fuels Association, et al., Intervenors.

No. 07-1257.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: November 16, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

BEFORE: Sentelle, Randolph, and Brown, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of intent to file a separate brief, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is.

ORDERED that intervenors be permitted to file a separate opening brief and reply brief, limited to 5,000 and 2,500 words respectively. Intervenors are cautioned to “avoid repetition of facts or legal arguments made in the principal (appellant/petitioner or appellee/respondent) brief, and focus on points not made or adequately elaborated upon in the principal brief, although relevant to the issues before this court.” D.C. Cir. Rule 28(d)(2).

Page 1