MARTIN v. HOWARD UNIV., 06-7157 (D.C. Cir. 7-11-2007)

Dawn V. Martin, Appellant v. Howard University, et al., Appellees.

No. 06-7157.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: July 11, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

BEFORE: Randolph and Rogers, Circuit Judges.

ORDER
Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the motion to exceed the page limit for a motion for summary reversal, the opposition thereto, and the reply; the lodged motion for summary reversal; the motion to strike the motion for summary reversal or, in the alternative, to extend time to respond to it, and the opposition thereto; and the National Association of Women Lawyers’ corrected motion for leave to file an amicus brief, the opposition thereto, and the reply; it is

ORDERED that the motion to exceed the page limit for the motion for summary reversal be denied. See D.C. Cir. Rule 27(h)(3). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to strike the motion for summary reversal or to extend time to respond be dismissed as moot. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the National Association of Women Lawyers’ motion for leave to file an amicus brief be granted.

The Clerk is directed to enter a briefing schedule.

Page 1