IN RE TURNER, 07-5219 (D.C. Cir. 9-13-2007)

In re: John Paul Turner, Petitioner.

No. 07-5219.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: September 13, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

BEFORE: Ginsburg, Chief Judge, and Griffith and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges.

ORDER
Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus and the memorandum in support (styled as “petition for appeal”); and the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus be denied. This action is frivolous and fails to state any claim which would warrant the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Nietzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Page 1