In re: Mihretu Bulti Dasisa, Petitioner.

No. 07-5280.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: October 17, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

BEFORE: Ginsburg, Chief Judge, and Henderson and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and the petition for writ of mandamus, it is.

ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be granted. It is.

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus be denied. The district court’s delay in ruling on petitioner’s pending motions does not warrant the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Gulfstream AerospaceCorp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988). We anticipate that the district court will act upon the pending motions as promptly as its docket permits. Petitioner has not shown that his right to mandamus relief as to the motion submitted to the district court on June 22, 2007 in No. 06-cv-2190 is clear and indisputable. See id.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Page 1