Labed Ahmed, petitioner v. Robert M. Gates, Respondent.

No. 07-1126.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: September 10, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

BEFORE: Henderson, Tatel, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

ORDER
Upon consideration of the motions, the opposition thereto, and the reply; and the interim protective order entered June 5, 2007, it is.

ORDERED that the motion for production of the Government Information, Government Evidence, exculpatory evidence, and any audiotapes of the Combatant Status Review Tribunal Proceedings be granted, consistent with this court’s opinion and protective order in Bismullah v. Gates, No. 06-1197, 2007 WL 2067938 (D.C. Cir. Jul. 20, 2007) (“Bismullah”). It is.

FURTHER ORDERED that the protective order entered by this court inBismullah, including any subsequent modifications approved by the court, be entered in this case pending further order of the court. It is.

FURTHER ORDERED, with respect to the motion for personal access to the Government Information, Government Evidence, exculpatory evidence, any audiotapes of the Combatant Status Review Tribunal Proceedings, and medical records, that the parties resolve the matters implicated by this motion in accordance with the court’s opinion and protective order inBismullah. To the extent they are unable to do so, the parties should address the matters in their briefs on the merits. It is.

Page 2

FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for Administrative Review Board materials and to dismiss be referred to the merits panel to which this case is assigned. The parties are directed to address in their briefs the issues presented by the motions rather than incorporate those arguments by reference.

The Clerk is directed to establish a briefing schedule.

Page 1