AES BEAVER VALLEY, LLC, Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent Duquesne Light Company, Intervenor.

No. 06-1400.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
January 25, 2008.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

John B. O’Sullivan, Chadbourne Parke LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Robert Harris Solomon, Joel Mark Cockrell, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Clifford M. Naeve, Glen Scott Bernstein, Kathryn Kavanagh Baran, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher Flom LLP, Washington, DC, for Intervenor.

Before: HENDERSON, RANDOLPH and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT
This petition for review was considered on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied.

For the reasons stated in the Commission’s decision and its brief, the decision was not “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). The decisions on which the petitioner relies are inapposite.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See
Fed.R.App.P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.