James Adeyemi, Appellant v. District of Columbia, Appellee.

No. 07-7077.United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: October 5, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

BEFORE: Henderson,[*] Tatel, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges.

[*] Judge Henderson would grant the motion for summary affirmance.

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, and the supplement to the motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, it is.

ORDERED that the motion be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog,Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.

Page 1